Re: Is this really the right thing to do?
Subject: Is this really the right thing to do?
Date: Sat, Nov 28, 1998 at 03:16:07PM -0500
In reply to:Ed Cogburn
Quoting Ed Cogburn(ecogburn@greene.xtn.net):
>
>
>
> I've been watching the explosive growth of deb packages in slink, now
> around 2700 packages. Recently, the split-up of X11 into around 12
> packages and the numerous packages used in slink for the Netscape
> programs and the huge number (around 30) of packages that has to be
> installed for the GNOME system, is, I fear, putting strain on an already
> strained dpkg/apt/dselect management system.
> The X11 split-up is particularly worrisome because the packages don't
> have a "common" prefix in the name, i.e. xfonts-100-xxx, xbase, xterm.
> Without a common prefix, the packages do not show up in the same place
> in dselect's selection screen. At the very least, all packages in X11
> system should have a name that starts with 'X11-', for example.
> The developers of dpkg could do something like add a 'package grouping'
> feature that lets newcomers (especially newbies to X11) understand the
> relationship between packages.
> This feature would, I fear, strain the dpkg system even more. I'm
> starting to see occasional failures under dselect/apt/dpkg that
> fortunately, for now, are transient (i.e. rerun dselect/apt and the
> failure doesn't reoccur). It suggests to me that we are pushing our
> package management software beyond its capability.
> Does anyone else have the same concerns?
>
Yes, definitely!
I have put off continuning client changeover from slackware to
debian due to these same concerns. Not to mention the condition of
the current slink.
>
> --
> Ed C.
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
>
--
Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware
has limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing
machines are so poor at I/O.
_______________________________________________________
Wayne T. Topa <wtopa@ix.netcom.com>
Reply to: