[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: problems compiling 2.1.126



On Tue, Nov 03, 1998 at 11:15:06PM +0100, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> 
> Does someone else have this problem when compiling kernel 2.1.126 on a
> hamm machine which underwent a partial "slinkification" ? (Meaning that
> a few packages were upgraded, notably modutils, libc6, libg++ and egcs)

http://www.linuxhq.com/lnxlists/linux-kernel/lk_9810_04/msg00253.html

HTH

James

> 
> egcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/scratch/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m486 -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=586   -c -o sysctl.o sysctl.c
> egcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/scratch/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m486 -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=586   -c -o acct.o acct.c
> acct.c: In function `check_free_space':
> acct.c:90: structure has no member named `f_inode'
> acct.c:85: warning: `sb' might be used uninitialized in this function
> make[3]: *** [acct.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/scratch/usr/src/linux/kernel'
> make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/usr/src/linux/kernel'
> make[1]: *** [_dir_kernel] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/usr/src/linux'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> root@penny:/usr/src/linux # 
> 
> 
> I was compiling using make-kpkg, not the direct 'classic' method of
> running make bzImage&make modules...
> 
> Pf
> 
> -- 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Pierfrancesco Caci  | mailto:p.caci@flashnet.it - http://gusp.infogroup.it
>        ik5pvx        |         http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Lofts/8999
>   Firenze - Italia   | Office for the Complication of Otherwise Simple Affairs 
>      Linux penny 2.1.125 #1 Fri Oct 16 23:18:57 CEST 1998 i586 unknown
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 
> 


Reply to: