[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Acroread & Hamm ???



Wayne Cuddy <wayne@crb-web.com> writes:

> Does Acroread work with hamm?  It tells me it can't find libXt.so.6.
> If I set my LD_LIBRARY_PATH I get a SEGV.  I do have libc5
> installed.

Install the xlib6 (and to be sure the xpm4.7) packages from the
oldlibs section.  Otherwise check the output of (in my version of
acroread) of

~$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/Acrobat3/Reader/intellinux/lib ldd /usr/lib/Acrobat3/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread 
        libreadcore.so => /usr/lib/Acrobat3/Reader/intellinux/lib/libreadcore.so (0x4000d000)
        libpfs.so => /usr/lib/Acrobat3/Reader/intellinux/lib/libpfs.so (0x4015f000)
        libagm.so => /usr/lib/Acrobat3/Reader/intellinux/lib/libagm.so (0x401e3000)
        libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libXt.so.6 (0x4026b000)
        libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libXext.so.6 (0x402ad000)
        libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libX11.so.6 (0x402b8000)
        libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x40356000)
        libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1 (0x4035f000)
        libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x40362000)
        libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libSM.so.6 (0x40420000)
        libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libICE.so.6 (0x40429000)

Your output should be quite similiar but please check if the directory
/usr/lib/Acrobat3/Reader/intellinux is the same in your version:

~$ dpkg -l acroread
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name            Version        Description
+++-===============-==============-============================================
ii  acroread        3.02-0.1       Adobe Acrobat Reader: Portable Document Form

	Torsten

BTW: In my version the dependency line seems to be correct:
     ldso (>= 1.9.7-0), libc5 (>= 5.4.0-0), xlib6 (>= 3.3-0)

-- 
Homepage: http://www.in-berlin.de/User/myrkr


Reply to: