[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libstdc++.so.2.8 problem (solution)




On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Peter Berlau wrote:

<clip>
> Does the 2.8_2.90 not conflict with the 2.9_2.
> or can it coexistent and,

They coexist fine.

> who and from where did You install the 
> g++ compiler and the gcc compiler
> assuming from `slink', than versions are
> egcs-1.1.1 pre-release #3 ??
> gcc version egcs-2.91.59
> dated 19982411
> ok ?

I have egcc 2.91.58-5 package from slink.

> gcc 2.7.2.3 (only needed for compiling kernels ?)
> ok ?

Correct

> I've just done this before reading Your email on list
> my /usr/lib shows

<clip>

I have the exactly same libraries. 

> Do I really need to hold the 2.8.x.x libs on hd or can 
> I remove it.
> I'm not sure, but I think there is no need for this, 
> or need the gcc 2.7.2.3 this libs during compiling kernel ?

There are still programs linked against 2.8.x.x library but I think you
are correct about not needing 2.7.x libs.


-- 
Janne


Reply to: