[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: -URGENT- exim:incoming message frozen



Ok. The problem was that in hosts file I find the next line:
193.231.157.1    router    router.citon.ro
After I switch the plce of  the router word with router.citon.ro
everything goes to normal.
Thanks



                               \\\___///
                              \\  - -  //
                               (  @ @  )
-----------------------------oOOo-(_)-oOOo--------------------------------
*Bubulac Angela Tatiana - National Institute for R&D of Materials Physics*
*			  Bucuresti - Magurele P.O.B. MG-7		 *
*			  Romania					 *
*e-mail: tatia@alpha1.infim.ro 	    |   phone :401-7805385 int.1380      *
*        root@alpha1.infim.ro	    |	       401-7806925               *
*       			    | 	       401-7804573		 *
--------------------------------------Oooo--------------------------------
                              oooO   (   )
                             (   )    ) /
                              \ (    (_/
                               \_)

On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, George Bonser wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, ing.Bubulac Angela Tatiana wrote:
> 
> >  for receiveing
> >  1998-10-15 09:20:57 0zTq92-0000pr-00 <= tatia@alpha1.infim.ro
> >  H=alpha1.infim.ro [193.231.44.2] P=smtp S=1313
> >  id==Pine.OSF.3.93..981015082455.1671A-100000@alpha1.infim.ro
> >  1998-10-15 09:20:57 0zTq92-0000pr-00 remote host address for
> >  router.citon.ro is the local host
> >  1998-10-15 09:20:57 0zTq92-0000pr-00 == root@router.citon.ro R=lookuphost
> >  defer (-1): remote host address is the local host
> >  1998-10-15 09:20:57 0zTq92-0000pr-00 Frozen
> 
> You need to add router.citron.ro to the local_domains entry if you want to
> accept mail as that domain. Exim sees that the MX or A record points to
> the local machine but the local config file is not set up to accept mail
> for that domain.
> 
> 
> 
> George Bonser
> 
> The Linux "We're never going out of business" sale at an FTP site near you!
> 
> 


Reply to: