[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Motherbnoard Sound Device



That is not exactly true.  I have an onboard Sound Pro which I have gotten
to work with my Linux box.  It has taken a lot of work and I'm not sure
exactly what I did to get it to work, but it does now work.  Have you
tried using isapnp?

On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Bert Conliffe wrote:

> Hi Fellow Motherboard Sound Device Users,
> 
> I too am having the same difficulty, getting my motherboard
> sound device to be recognized by the current linux sound
> drivers.  I've done all sorts of gyrations with the kernel
> and configuring sound ( I've configured fixed and loadable
> modules ), and to date, it always comes back the same.
> The configuration takes place, but the devices are not found.
> I've also used MSS" in my configurations, to no avail.
> 
> The motherboard is a Pentium MMX which has an on board Sound
> Pro.  The documentation states, it is Sound Blaster 16/PRO
> compatible. Windows 95 is using the following to access the
> sound device and it works great.  The specs are:
> 
>  SB16  DSP 4.13  Port: 220h  IRQ: 5  DMA: 1  DMAhigh: 5
> 
> I've contacted several linux/sound/knowledgeable persons,
> and they all state that the current sound drivers do not
> support the motherboard sound device.
> 
> I hope that I'm putting "my foot in my mouth", ( because
> it would provide a solution to our problem ); but, I
> think that until someone modifies a current sound driver,
> or writes a new one, if we want sound, we'll have to look
> elsewhere for a solution.
> 
> Bert
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 

=======================================================================
ratirh@lore.cs.purdue.edu : Role-Player, Babylon 5 fanatic      1998-99
Aka Khyron the Backstabber : ICQ# 2325055
Homepage: www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/ratirh 

"Happiness comes in short spurts.  Don't be fooled."
=======================================================================


Reply to: