Re: NAT

[Alexander <vulture@abac.com>]

Hi...

Ummmm, that looks interesting. I don't think Linux's IP-masq system
supports that.

Alex

On Fri, 17 Jul 1998, George Bonser wrote:

> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 12:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
> From: George Bonser <grep@shorelink.com>
> Reply-To: grep@oriole.sbay.org
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: NAT
> Resent-Date: 17 Jul 1998 19:16:12 -0000
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
> 
> 
> This is a question about network address translation, not IP-Masquerading.
> Has anyone ever done this and if so, can you point me to the documents?
> 
> Here is the situation. I have a subnet where I want to masquerade the
> network but not the host part of the address.  192.168.0.45 might turn
> into 10.0.0.45. The purpose is to allow a third network to talk to hosts
> on a two other networks that are using identical address space. I want to
> translate one of the networks so the third will see it as different and
> route data to it correctly.
> 
> 10.0.1.x --------- Linux Box1 --------192.168.0.x
>             
>             
> 10.0.2.x---- ------Linux Box2 --------192.168.0.x
> 
> I can not use IP masquerading because I do not want all of the hosts to
> appear as the IP address of the Linux box, I just want to translate the
> network address so I can still address each box directly from the 10 net.
> 
> 
> Has anyone ever done this before?
> 
> 
> George Bonser
> 
> Microsoft! Which end of the stick do you want today?
> 
> 
> 
> --  
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 
> 


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null