Re: Re[6]: pop3 mail problem
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 09:43:07AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 1998 09:36:04 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> > Well, that depends. I'm not sure if cucipop impliments the nonstandard
> >POP send protocol. I do believe that is proprietary to qpopper and not part
> >of the formal RFC. Of course, I don't have them handy to confirm, so take
> >that all with a mild grain of salt.
>
> Just wanted to say that cucipop does not support pop sends. Just tried
> it and it returned:
>
> Tue, 09 Jun 98 09:41:06 ==> -ERR Invalid command, try one of: STAT, LIST
> [msg], RETR msg, TOP msg n, DELE msg, UIDL [msg], NOOP, RSET, QUIT ; Your
> server, while it is a POP3 server, does not support sending.
>
> I think the last part pretty much sums it up. ;)
A few messages back you said that you found qpopper unacceptable because
the POP send is buggy, so you preferred cucipop. Now you say cucipop
doesn't even have POP send. Am I missing something here?
hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au, hmoffatt@mail.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: