Re: Stronghold Apache

To: jkloss@cs.jhu.edu (John Kloss)
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Stronghold Apache
From: Pete Harlan <harlan@pointofchoice.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 11:38:25 -0500 (CDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 199805281638.LAA12366@mango.pointofchoice.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980528015927.3615B-100000@theseus> from "John Kloss" at May 28, 98 02:10:30 am

> (I'm assuming 1.2.6 since 1.3 is still beta) with 128bit  encryption. They
> have binaries for red hat 5.0 but I want to use debian 2.0 since it's what
> I know and I like it.
> 
> anyone had any experience with this? anyone know of another way (other

We've done it with [the nearly prehistoric] Debian 1.3, and it works
fine.  Don't know about 2.0.

--
Pete Harlan
harlan@pointofchoice.com
I burnt hamm on a CD and now the house smells like bacon and melted plastic.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Stronghold Apache
  - From: John Kloss <jkloss@cs.jhu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Intel Redwood(?) motherboard
Next by Date: Diagnosing NFS or network problems
Previous by thread: Re: Stronghold Apache
Next by thread: mutt not in color
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread