Re: Sill question about dependancies

To: Debian Userslist <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Sill question about dependancies
From: Martin Bialasinski <martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de>
Date: 19 May 1998 00:48:45 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87zpgfjiuq.fsf@haitech.martin.home>
In-reply-to: "Steve Lamb"'s message of "Mon, 18 May 1998 13:55:26 -0700"
References: <[🔎] 199805182056.NAA13155@mail.calweb.com>

>>>>> "SL" == Steve Lamb <morpheus@calweb.com> writes:

SL> icewm_0.8.16-1.deb doesn't have a dependancy for an xserver, shouldn't
SL> it?

Imagine this case: 

You use a xserver on a windows system to connect to your ox via xdm. Then
you start applications and use a wm, but don't run a xserver on the box.

So no dependency.

Ciao,
	Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Sill question about dependancies
  - From: "Steve Lamb" <morpheus@calweb.com>

Prev by Date: ping: "Operation not permitted"
Next by Date: Re: Can't start X ! root
Previous by thread: Re: Sill question about dependancies
Next by thread: Re: Sill question about dependancies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread