IP Masquerading - getting "ipfwadm: setsockopt failed ...". Is Debian 1.3 (bo) compiled with IP-masquerading?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: IP Masquerading - getting "ipfwadm: setsockopt failed ...". Is Debian 1.3 (bo) compiled with IP-masquerading?
From: Milan Zimmermann <mzimmerm@worldchat.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 00:49:26 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 355531D6.6ECA9240@worldchat.com>

I am wondering, is the default kernel from 386-binary(bo) compiled with
Masquerading?

I do not know if that is my problem, but whenever I try to use the
"ipfwadm" command (with [hopefully] valid switches) I always get a
message "ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Protocol not available"

Thanks, Milan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IP Masquerading - getting "ipfwadm: setsockopt failed ...". Is Debian 1.3 (bo) compiled with IP-masquerading?
  - From: George Bonser <grep@shorelink.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Help with cdwrite
Next by Date: Re: Setup w/large hard drives
Previous by thread: System hang while loading Serial Module
Next by thread: Re: IP Masquerading - getting "ipfwadm: setsockopt failed ...". Is Debian 1.3 (bo) compiled with IP-masquerading?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread