Re: PINE Debian Package

[Mike Miller <miller5@uiuc.edu>]

>>>>> "George" == George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org> writes:

    > No, I think someone is taking the politics of free software
    > to an extreme.  It looks like someone in Debian decided
    > that their patches to configure it resulted in a
    > "derivative work" and since pine does not allow derivative
    > works to be called pine, it looks like it got yanked.

What about the pine package that /is/ in non-free?  It apparently
has not been yanked - only moved to non-free, which seems a
reasonable place for non-free software.  


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org