Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is multitasking.

To: Paul Miller <paul@3dillusion.com>
Cc: "C.J.LAWSON" <C.J.Lawson@cranfield.ac.uk>, debian-user mailing list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is multitasking.
From: "C.J.LAWSON" <C.J.Lawson@Cranfield.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 14:30:06 +0100 (BST)
Message-id: <Pine.OSF.3.95.980420142844.2297A-100000@paris.pegasus.cranfield.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980418004948.892C-100000@serv1.3dillusion.com>

> commercial on the radio about Win98 being the OS of future businesses...
> Win98 runs one hell of a lot slower than Win95 and multitasks even worse.. 
> I don't know where M$ came up with Win98 running programs faster than
> Win95..   Win98 is a disaster; _never_ install it, it is a complete waste
> of time and money.

Well if decide to pay for a doddgy OS when an excellent free one is
available ..."On your head be it"

Jonathan
--

	In any war, the first casualty is the truth.
						
						--anon



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is multitasking.
  - From: Paul Miller <paul@3dillusion.com>

Prev by Date: Re: why?
Next by Date: Re: Big hard disks
Previous by thread: Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is multitasking.
Next by thread: Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is mul
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread