Re: Upgrading to glibc2
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:
> Ok... I see an "autoup.sh" lying around on the net that lets me upgrade
> my debian 1.3.1R6 to "2.0" in the sense that it gives me glibc2 and I can
> finally grab "hamm" packages. Anyone notice any particular bugs with glibc2 or
> the hamm packages? (unstable?) I know they say they are unstable, but someone
> told me that debian 2.0 is close to release and that the unstable stuff is
> actually pretty stable now? Should I bother? My system is working great
> now.... what kind of other advantages should I see?
I upgraded to hamm about six weeks ago and haven't had any problems since
I got things set up.
Stable in terms of things working well; unstable in terms of package
updates daily (often to clean things up with no operational impact).
There are several packages in hamm which do not exist for bo (although I
didn't check bo-unstable, which may have many of them).
Your mileage may vary.
Bob
---
Bob Nielsen Internet: nielsen@primenet.com
Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: w6swe@01.w6swe.ampr.org
http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen/
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to listmaster@debian.org .
Reply to: