Now FHS, Was RE: FSSTND with Permissions?
I ran "Filesystem Hierarchy Standard -- Version 2.0" "as a
phrase," on the Metacrawler and received one hit to
Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
by Daniel Quinlan, of course. From noting certain aspects of some
of the other questions to this user list, I thought it might be a
good reference for others to use (if practices have not been revised
much since it was published) while lessening traffic. Thanks for the
essential keywords and the correction on the file system standard,
Steve. And thanks for any corrections to this post, mentors, if I
am off-track. Now, to search for a large cache of information on
general, applied "permissions."
Art Lemasters
On 12 Feb 98 at 0:29, Stephen Carpenter wrote:
> To answer one question....
> the FSSTND is now outdated.
> The current standard doc is the
> "Filesystem Hierarchy Standard -- Version 2.0"
> Dated Oct. 26 , 1997
> also known as the FHS
> I don't know where to get it...
> I found it somewhere a coupla months back
> goto altavista and do asearch on the filename "fhs.ps"
> it shoul dhave some hits (once ya have a filename you can usually pull
> up alot of pages with the file you want....little trick I learned back
> when I used Win95 and used to look
> for "Warez"....course now that im running linux...I have no need to do
> that anymore)
> As I remember it even says on the offcial website (wherever that is)
> "Here i sthe FSSTND the old version . Stop Using it"
> -Steve
>
> > Where on the Web can we find an example of the latest
> >FSSTND (if this is still the standard) with permissions
> >shown? As you may see from the header on this message,
> >each time my LINUX system is up, more damage is possible.
> >Some of my previous posts on this have not even made it to
> >the list.
> >
> >Art Lemasters
>
>
>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: