Re: xt?
Carl Johnson writes:
> The system did use the 286 protected mode, so it had full memory
> management. You could use more than 64K of memory, but it was a pain
> since you had to compile using Intel large model.
And I walked 12 miles to school, uphill *both* ways :)
I had (still have) an Onyx with a Z8002 cpu and a TTL MMU. It had a a full
Meg of RAM, but no process could address more than 64k. I ported lots of
BSD stuff to it, though.
--
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
jghasler@win.bright.net Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
Received: (qmail 29717 invoked by uid 888); 7 Mar 1997 21:14:47 -0000
Delivered-To: debian-lists--devel@master.debian.org
Received: (qmail 29715 invoked by uid 888); 7 Mar 1997 21:14:47 -0000
Delivered-To: debian-devel@debian.org
Received: (qmail 29713 invoked from network); 7 Mar 1997 21:14:47 -0000
Received: from golem.pixar.com (138.72.27.59)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 1997 21:14:46 -0000
Received: by golem.pixar.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #2)
id m0w36ow-00MKNgC; Fri, 7 Mar 97 13:04 PST
Message-Id: <m0w36ow-00MKNgC@golem.pixar.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 97 13:04 PST
From: bruce@pixar.com (Bruce Perens)
To: debian-devel@debian.org, maintonly@bugs.debian.org, Klee Dienes
<klee@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: debstd strips static libraries?
Reply-To: Bruce Perens <bruce@pixar.com>
It's clear from the conditional that avoids stripping libraries with "_g"
in their names that he intended to strip debugging symbols.
--strip-debug would indeed be appropriate.
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP Bruce@Pixar.com 510-215-3502
Finger bruce@master.Debian.org for PGP public key.
PGP fingerprint = 88 6A 15 D0 65 D4 A3 A6 1F 89 6A 76 95 24 87 B3
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: xt?
- From: csmall@gonzo.triode.net.au
- Re: xt?
- From: jghasler@win.bright.net
- Re: xt?
- From: "marsh" <marsh@afn.org>
- Re: xt?
- From: Carl Johnson <carlj@peak.org>