Re: modules/modutils (Re: Dselect: Obsolete packages really obsolete?)

To: jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl
Cc: gbauer@risc.uni-linz.ac.at, wichert@wi.leidenuniv.nl, debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: modules/modutils (Re: Dselect: Obsolete packages really obsolete?)
From: "Wichert Akkerman \(SBH\)" <wichert@wi.leidenuniv.nl>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 14:25:45 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19971020142545.07143@pc135a>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19971020095425.13245@wi.leidenuniv.nl>; from jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl on Mon, Oct 20, 1997 at 09:54:25AM +0100
References: <[🔎] 34487F14.DFA8B7CC@risc.uni-linz.ac.at> <[🔎] 19971020095425.13245@wi.leidenuniv.nl>

On Mon, Oct 20, 1997 at 09:54:25AM +0100, jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl wrote:
> Replacing modules by modutils will require some tricky dpkg stuff. Wichert?

Actually it should be automic now: when you install modutils it replaces
all of modules' files.dpkg will notice that and mark modules as removed.

Gernot, if this does not work, can you tell me what version of modules
you have installed?

Wichert.

Attachment: pgpQSqMFtTO_M.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Dselect: Obsolete packages really obsolete?
  - From: Gernot Bauer <gbauer@risc.uni-linz.ac.at>
- modules/modutils (Re: Dselect: Obsolete packages really obsolete?)
  - From: jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl

Prev by Date: Re: new debian user questions
Next by Date: Re: Pine and fvwm under hamm
Previous by thread: modules/modutils (Re: Dselect: Obsolete packages really obsolete?)
Next by thread: MOMSpider
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread