Re: Bash upgrade,Netscape helpers...
Jens B. Jorgensen writes:
>
>Damir J. Naden wrote:
>>
>> Hi, everyone --
>>
>> I was following the thread that was going on for a while here regarding
>> the bug in bash 2.0 that is holding us back in using some Netscape
>> helpers. I must admit that I missed the final point: what is the best
>> way of fixing this problem? Usualy i'd go to unstable and fetched and
[snip]
>
>I have ftp'd bash-2.01 from mit. I tar -xzf'd it. Ran ./configure.
>Ran make, make tests, and everything looks kosher. I'm replacing the
>bash I have. My system is "stock" 1.3.1 from a Greenbush Technologies
>Gold CD. The size is 412800 bytes uncompressed, 188709 compressed
>with gzip -9. I'll email it to anyone who wants it (no warranties,
>expressed or implied as to the usability or fitness for a specific
>purpose, etc. etc. etc.). It seems to work fine on this system, though
>I've just compiled it and been using it. I've been using it on our
>Solaris system for weeks and have had no problems.
>
>--
>Jens B. Jorgensen
>jjorgens@bdsinc.com
>
Regardless of the status of libc6, the change over to 1.3.x or 1.3 Rev
x, the desire to keep changes to the stable tree to a minimum, or
whatever, this needs to be upgraded NOW. I have had a few other apps
crap out on this bash 2.0 bug and since the Debian system lives and
dies by bash it needs to be fixed A.S.A.P. by the maintainer, and or
the development team, not kind Jens who got sick of it enough to
download the source.
My $0.02(US)
Brian
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: