Re: Enlightenment WM
Shaleh hat gesagt: // Shaleh wrote: (shaleh@livenet.net):
> Who uses this WM and how well does it work? I just read the owner's
> page and buzz sheet but I want to hear it from the users. Does it work
> as fast/well/smoothly as fvwm, twm or some other WM manager? I guess I
> am asking for a general survey of who uses what and how well they like
> it.
Currently I have installed the most recent version of "E" on my AMD 5x86
(that's a 486) with 133 MHz and 16 MB RAM. I must say, that I still use
fvwm2 for daily work because E is very slow with my hardware. Running the
squid-proxy, netscape and stuff at the same time slows my system to a near
halt.
On the other hand, E has become quite stable. And this WM is not about
performance, I think. It's about being the "kewlest" window manager around
and it meets this goal like nothing else.
I don't work with it, but I look at it. Maybe that's not what one should do
with a WM, but who carez.
E is the one reason for me to buy a faster machine. Intels price drop is
the other...
--
Yours,
Frank Barknecht
<<<<---------------------------------------------------->>>>
<a href="http://www.koeln-online.de/einblick/";>
Das Kölner Stadt- und Unimagazin
</a>
<<<<--------------------------------------------------->>>>>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: