Re: [gtk-list] Re: sane problems
> > > > these are the errors i received:
> > > >
> > > > gdk.c:31: X11/Xatom.h: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > This sounds to me like you need to install the XFree86
> > > developement package. For RedHat systems, this is the XFree86-devel rpm,
> > > but I don't know what it would be for your Debian system (although I'm
> > > sure there is one). Install it and try again.
> >
> > Yep, xlib6-dev. I think you need the xpm and xpm-dev packages as well,
> > but I could be wrong.
> >
> > Ian
> ok, here's what i went and got:
>
> getting: stable/binary-i386/libs/tk40_4.0p3-5.deb (486302)
> getting: stable/binary-i386/x11/xpm4.7-dev_3.4g-9.deb (29020)
> getting: stable/binary-i386/x11/xlib6-dev_3.3-3.deb (614682)
> getting: stable/binary-i386/devel/tcl76-dev_7.6p2-4.deb (630164)
>
> ...and after i did a ./configure, i did make, and got these errors:
>
> ../gdk/.libs/libgdk.so.1.0: undefined reference to `XUngrabPointer'
> ../gdk/.libs/libgdk.so.1.0: undefined reference to `XPutImage'
> ../gdk/.libs/libgdk.so.1.0: undefined reference to `XCreatePixmap'
> ../gdk/.libs/libgdk.so.1.0: undefined reference to `XUnmapWindow'
> ../gdk/.libs/libgdk.so.1.0: undefined reference to `XSetFillStyle'
> ../gdk/.libs/libgdk.so.1.0: undefined reference to `XCreateGC'
> ../gdk/.libs/libgdk.so.1.0: undefined reference to `XOpenDisplay'
You surely missed libX11.so.6 which is in plain xlib6 package.
And, there is possibility that loader line in Makefile had incorrect
order of libraries specified.
Alex Y.
>
> ...actually, there were *way* too many of these to list, these were just
> the last ones.
>
> what else should i get???
>
> thanks,
> matty
>
--
_
_( )_
( (o___ +-------------------------------------------+
| _ 7 | Alexander Yukhimets aqy6633@is5.nyu.edu |
\ (") | http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/ |
/ \ \ +-------------------------------------------+
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: