Re: XF86 3.3-3

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: XF86 3.3-3
From: Christian Kauhaus <ckauhaus@informatik.uni-rostock.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 12:09:52 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19970709120952.46050@catalina>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970709012509.14846C-100000@huifang.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from H Huang on Wed, Jul 09, 1997 at 02:08:01AM -0700
References: <[🔎] 19970709100357.54293@catalina> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970709012509.14846C-100000@huifang.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>

Hi!

On 9-Jul-97, H Huang wrote:
> Are you asking the debian maintainer to provide a *stable* XF86Config
> setup file for *every* X server? There's no way he/she could do that. 

It's clear that this is impossible. But if this acceleration code is really
beta, there should be at least a warning, as You stated.

  Christian

-- 
                              Christian Kauhaus
                      University of Rostock, Dept of CS
---------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
    Linux-Sysadmin on      |                    WWW-Homepage
catalina   patmos   paxi   |   http://www.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~ckauhaus
---------------------------+-------------------------------------------------


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . Trouble? 
e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

References:
- Re: XF86 3.3-3
  - From: Christian Kauhaus <ckauhaus@informatik.uni-rostock.de>
- Re: XF86 3.3-3
  - From: H Huang <h.huang@usa.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Mailers
Next by Date: Re: nobody is running find at too high a priority
Previous by thread: Re: XF86 3.3-3
Next by thread: Re: XF86 3.3-3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread