Re: DNS/IP-Masq combination
Mario,
I have a very similar setup, and I had to setup the IP-MASQ machine as a
nameserver. I don't know techincally why this was necessary as on my last
installation I didn't have to. I was having fits until I installed bind,
and it's worked like a charm ever since. I would love an explanation, if
anyone out there knows, why a setup like this seems to break name lookups
from subnet1 & subnet2 to the Gateway nameserver.
Ben
bewhite@bgsm.edu
>Hi,
>
> I have set a debian machine as a IP-Masq for 2 subnets:
>
> ____subnet 1____ (most win3.x/95 mach)
> |
>Gateway-------------IP-MASQ
>nameserver |
> ----subnet 2-----(win3.x/95 and Linux(my))
>
> I would like to know:
> 1. should I set the IP-MASQ machine as nameserver for my 2
>subnets?
> 2. should I put 3 entries in hosts file (one for real IP, one for
>subnet1 and other for subnet2)?
> 3. I'm using SSL, and when I try to connect from my Linux machine
>(reserved IP) to the IP-MASQ server, the connect takes a endless time to
>be established (30sec). What should I verify to correct this?
>
> thanks,
>
>[]s,
> Mario O.de Menezes mailto:mario@curiango.ipen.br
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: