Re: vi
On 14 Apr 1997, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
> >>>>> Craig Sanders writes:
>
> vi:
>
> Craig> 1G # move to start of file
> Craig> /192.168.1 # search for 192.168.1
> Craig> 5cw192.168.200<ESC> # change 5 'words' to 192.168.2
> Craig> n # find next
> Craig> . # repeat change
> Craig> n # find next
> Craig> . # repeat change
> Craig> n # find next
> Craig> . # repeat change
> Craig> :x # save andexit
>
> emacs:
>
> M-< ; go to beginning of file
> C-x ( ; start recording kbd macro
> C-s 129.168.1 RET ; search for 192.168.1
> M-b M-b M-b ; go back three words
> M-d M-d M-d ; delete three words
> 129.168.200 ; insert new string
> C-x ) ; end kbd macro
> C-x e ; repeat
> C-x e ; repeat
> C-x e ; repeat
>
> Nothing to do with "modeless".
vi: 37 keystrokes
emacs: 40 keystrokes (if we count C-x or M-x as one; vi diesn't have
all this C- and M- stuff).
--
Vadim Vygonets * vadik@cs.huji.ac.il * vadik@debian.org * Unix admin
If you think C++ is not overly complicated, just what is a protected
abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor, and when was
the last time you needed one? -- Tom Cargil, C++ Journal, Fall 1990.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: vi
- From: Britton <fsblk@aurora.alaska.edu>
- References:
- Re: vi
- From: Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@ls6.cs.uni-dortmund.de>