[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: X personal configuration files: .fvwm2rc vs. .Xdefaults



I run all my xterms from the fvwm menu or the buttons so my lines look like
this  ""xterm"               Exec exec xterm -fg lightgrey -bg black -sb &"
You are correct in saying that .Xdefaults should handle this I'm not sure
why it wouldn't, I use .Xdefaults to configure knews.  Tell me what you
find.

On Fri, 7 Mar 1997, Jean-Paul LACHARME wrote:

>Hi, 
>
>I use fvwm2, and it works without real problem. Lots of desktop features are designed within .fvwm2rc. In other systems, some X local features are designed within a .Xdefaults file. I did not find any global template for .Xdefaults in Debian. Nevertheles
s, I wonder if creating such a file can be avoided when using X through fvwm2. I confess that I have not a clear idea of which configures what. I suppose that .Xdefaults is just fit for raw X commands and .fvwm2rc for the upper graphic layer, but it helps
 little.
>
>For example, it has been said that running a color Xterm (which is very convenient) needs only to add the line 'Xterm*customization: -color'. OK. So,  I created a .Xdefaults file into my home directory with this single line, but this was without any effe
ct (in fact, I expected no more. Things are more complex). 
>
>I did not even success to change the default shinning white background of the xterm windows (pity for my eyes !). I performed a grep white command on the config files, but it gave me nothing. 
>
>Has somebody some ideas about it ?
>
>Regards, 
>
>JP L
>------------------------------------------:-)
>Jean-Paul Lacharme.
>GREQAM UMR 6579 au CNRS
>Centre de la Vieille Charite. 2, rue de la Charite.
>13002 Marseille. FRANCE
>Tel.: 0491140731/Fax:0491900227
>


Jason Killen                            Question Stupidity
Monolith : driven by inner daemons      RPS : better living through world
jkillen@tinuviel.cs.wcu.edu                domination

     


Reply to: