[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Anyone know about AMD K5Pxxx processors?



On Sat, 18 Jan 1997, Nathan L. Cutler wrote:

> >>>>> "Syrus" == Syrus Nemat-Nasser <syrus@UCSD.EDU> writes:
> 
>     Syrus> Hello.  I'm considering a desktop upgrade for my home, and
>     Syrus> I'm wondering if any of you know how the AMD chips perform
>     Syrus> under Linux.  Specifically, I'm interested in the AMD
>     Syrus> K5P133 verses a Pentium 100 or 120.  I've read that the FPU
>     Syrus> speed does not measure up, but that the card just rips with
>     Syrus> integer operations.  I'm interested in fast video and fast
>     Syrus> loading of large apps mostly.
> 
>     Syrus> Any opinions?
> 
> If you buy one, make sure you get a CPU fan for it, or you may not
> have it very long. ;-)
> 
> But seriously, I have an AMD-K5 PR133 and am quite satisfied with it
> (aside from the noise of the CPU fan).  Large apps load quickly.  Fast
> video is more a function of the display card (and the quality of the
> display card driver), but with my S3 Trio 64+ (cheap) video is
> acceptable, but it is that with a Pentium 90 as well.
> 

I just installed a new motherboard with a K5-PR100 and it performs as
described above.  The FPU is no better than a 100MHz 486 but the integer
processing is better than a 90MHz Pentium.

Considering the price I got on the board, a good value!

Cheers

Carlo 

    ***********************************************************************
    *                            Carlo U. Segre                           *
    *      Department of Biological, Chemical and Physical Sciences       *
    *        Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616          *
    *   Voice: (312) 567-3498                      FAX: (312) 567-3494    *
    *                      segre@charlie.cns.iit.edu                      *
    ***********************************************************************


--
This message was delayed because the list mail delivery agent was down.


Reply to: