Re: bo, rex?

To: Lawrence Chim <ychim@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bo, rex?
From: Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 00:30:41 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 199611180830.AAA23189@tantale.fifi.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 Nov 1996 00:02:45 +1100." <[🔎] 328DBB75.2FC1@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au>

On Sun, 17 Nov 1996 00:02:45 +1100 Lawrence Chim (ychim@yallara.cs.rmi
t.edu.au) wrote:

> why there is bo in the ftp site?  Is it the same as rex?

Rex, aka frozen, aka 1.2 is under code freeze. No new package is added there. Bo is the new development (unstable) version.
Currently, most of the bo packages are symlinks to rex, so nothing is duplicated.

Phil.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

References:
- bo, rex?
  - From: Lawrence Chim <ychim@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Re: kernel version
Next by Date: Re: X11 bashing
Previous by thread: Re: bo, rex?
Next by thread: Re: bo, rex?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread