Re: Is .deb still better than .rpm?
On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Mark Carroll wrote:
> > It is like emacs to the novice. (cryptic, non-standard interface, funny
> > keyboard accel keys, no menues...)
> Hmmm - I got on well with dselect from the beginning, without reading any
> documentation about it, and I find it a convenient, useful tool. <grin> Am
> I in a minority of one, I wonder? I'd be very interested to learn what
> people's specific gripes are.
1) The damn keys. I have installed debian 4 times, and I still have to
read the keystroke page very often.
2) The oh-so-long 600 packages list.
But I really don't like the Redhat 3.0 installer. It's ugly. If we were to
make an X version of dselect, it should look pretty.
The installation procedure is *very* important, because a new Debian user
should instantly get the feeling he's done the Right Thing :-)
All The Best,
This message was distributed manually by Bruce@debian.org after the list
initially failed to distribute it.