Re: Ghostscript Dependency Problem

To: submit-linux-debian-user@ratatosk.yggdrasil.com
Subject: Re: Ghostscript Dependency Problem
From: jghasler@win.bright.net (John Hasler)
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 96 14:22 CST
Message-id: <[🔎] m0vHbjI-0008U6C@hasler>
Reply-to: jghasler@win.bright.net (John Hasler)
In-reply-to: <[🔎] m0vHawQ-00013iC@rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl> (joost@rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl)

joost witteveen writes:
> Sure, that's the best. But a lot of Debian maintainers don't really like
> "non-free" to begin with, and don't like to give non-free the same
> prefferential treatment the main system gets.

Then get rid of it.  Do it right, or not at all.

John Hasler
jghasler@win.bright.net (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Ghostscript Dependency Problem
  - From: joost@rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl (joost witteveen)

Prev by Date: Re: Annoying package dependence concept
Next by Date: Re: Annoying package dependence concept
Previous by thread: Re: Ghostscript Dependency Problem
Next by thread: Digest version?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread