Re: Annoying package dependence concept

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Annoying package dependence concept
From: jghasler@win.bright.net (John Hasler)
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 96 14:39 CST
Message-id: <[🔎] m0vHbz3-0008U6C@hasler>
Reply-to: jghasler@win.bright.net (John Hasler)
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 877moc2nly.fsf@slip-104-25.ots.utexas.edu> (message from Guy Maor on 27 Oct 1996 13:50:17 -0600)

> Guy Maor writes:
> > That's because dselect treats recommendations as dependencies,...

I wrote:
> Why?

Guy Maor writes:
> See the Programmer's Manual, section 8.2.

I don't have anything identifying itself as the Programmer's Manual.  Where
is it found?

John Hasler
jghasler@win.bright.net (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI

--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Annoying package dependence concept
  - From: Warwick HARVEY <warwick@cs.mu.oz.au>

References:
- Re: Annoying package dependence concept
  - From: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: useradd?
Next by Date: Re: Ghostscript Dependency Problem
Previous by thread: Re: Annoying package dependence concept
Next by thread: Re: Annoying package dependence concept
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread