[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How can I submit packages to be included in the distribution?



On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Dermot Bradley wrote:
> > Look at Squid instead - an old version can be found in rex/unstable. It's 
> > a few version behind.
> Never heard of Squid. Speedwise I have seen no other software that could
> compete with Harvester.

Squid started out as patches for Harvest whenever its (free) development 
stopped. However squid now has more functionally than Harvest cached - in 
the same way as Apache started from NCSA's httpd. Have a look at
http://www.nlanr.net

> > I've also been working on a few packages myself:
> > 
> > - analog			WWW stats program
> > - apache + php + webcounter	Apache with several additional modules
> There are webcounter cgi-bin thingies that we are using on our site.

I'm using the webcounter module as it's neater.

> The most important stuff for you will probably be the apache source code.
> I'd really like to see someone maintaining it and keeping it current.

Creating a debian package of apache1.1.1 is simple - I just used the 
debian.* files out of the old package as a basis. That's when I started 
added extras like the webcounter.......

> > - gated				(for internal use - Gated have strict
> > 				redistribution policies!)
> I know. Perhaps you can just publish the patches and have debian.rules do
> an automatic ftp from the gated site?

Can do. I haven't started on it yet - hopefully within the next week. A 
few header files gated needs seem to be missing (like 
/usr/include/netinet/ip_var.h) and I believe that libc5.3.x should have 
them so I may need to upgrade parts of my system to "unstable".

Dermot

-- 
Dermot Bradley                                Email: bradley@gpl.net
Communications Director                       Tel: 01232 560552
Genesis Project Ltd                           Fax: 01232 560553
Belfast & Derry, Northern Ireland             WWW: http://www.gpl.net/



Reply to: