Re: Seg 11 in GCC
firstname.lastname@example.org (Michael Alan Dorman) wrote on 29.03.96 in <m0u2fHx-00029GC@lot49.med.miami.edu>:
> So, I've not changed the hardware, and I'm excercising it more than I
> was previously (keeping the load above 6, mostly), and yet I see no
> SIG11s, even during the parallel compilations. That would tend to
> cast significant doubt on the common assertion that SIG11 = hardware
> problem, no?
You have *one* case where the reason *may* be something different.
On the other hand, there are at least thousands of cases where it
*clearly* was a hardware problem - hardware fiddling made it go away.
Apply the math yourself.