Re: regras pra mailfilter e html
(ele fala sobre barrar msg html no mailfilter)
>c.: Procurei na net mas infelismente até agora não encontrei nada. Se por
>c.: acaso encontrar alguma coisa poderia repassar para mim ?!?!?
Bem que eu perguntei, pois ao meu ver não tem como.
Achei que tivesse lido aquila página da lista de mailfilter-user, bom
ela está em inglês... Eu li por cima.
Outra coisa é que uma outra pessoa me disse que a página não funciona,
e de fato ela não estava "no ar" algumas vezes que tentei. Vou
tentar mandar em anexo, na forma de texto pra quem não pode ler.
Bom, depois de não receber ajuda, o melhor é migrar pra um servidor com
anti-spam. Até uma outra oportunidade de eu tentar querer receber resposta
e assinar de novo a lista.
Até a todos, obrigado,
Luiz
Tu não recebe resposta???
(Dica: o melhor é visitar #debian-br do irc.debian.org)
Neste canal tu pode achar alguém pra dar um mão prontamente, ou depois
de algumas hora. Se o problema for grave vale a pena ficar de plantão às
madrugadas por horas e dia seguidos, também no final de semana... (a
menos que tenha um amigo na sua cidade pra te salvar...)
Cada um pega o cobertor conforme o frio :)
--
http://www.lujz.org/lfpor/
Email Archive: mailfilter-users (read-only)
.From: Ron Johnson <ron@co...>
.Re: 4 suggestions for simple improvements to MailFilter
.2003-09-29 09:58
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:23, Sundial Services wrote:
> MailFilter is, of course, priceless for us right now. I'd like to make 3 very
> simple suggestions for improvements that I think would make it vastly more
> useful to us:
>
> [1] Allow the 'n' of 'TOP messagenumber n' to be user-specifiable. Currently
> it appears to use '0' but many more messages could be filtered if this were a
> user-specifiable option. '25' or '30' would allow many more junk messages to
> be detected.
>
> [2] One obvious characteristic of spam-mail, at least for us, is that
> spammers always send great numbers of nearly-identically-sized messages and
> do so all-at-once. Therefore, if two messages are identically-sized (or I
> would prefer, "identical +/- N bytes") and they don't come from a friend,
> they're spam. Let me delete all of them or choose to keep Z copies. (Z is
> user-specifiable; default 1.)
>
> [3] It might be much more complicated, but it would be nice, if the program
> could read the text of messages and compare the number of words they have in
> common in the first section. I envision that this algorithm would parse the
> message text for words, promoting words seen more than once and eventually
> dropping words seen only once, keeping only so-many words in the pool. Then
> go back and develop a signature based on word occurrence and count, and throw
> out dupes.
Then you'd have SpamAssassin inside mailfilter.
> [4] Attachments! If an attachment matching a certain pattern like "*.EXE" or
> "*.SCR" or "*.PHP" could be seen, then it's junk.
The problem in that the content descriptors for such attachments
may be *many* (like 200-300) lines into the body of the message,
and to read so much, while only a fraction of a 150KB swen mail,
is *all* of most emails, which means that you'd read each email
twice: once by mailfilter, and once by the process that "really"
gets the whole email.
And on a disl-up line, that would just about defeat the purpose
of mailfilter, it seems to me.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@co...
Jefferson, LA USA
"As the night fall does not come at once, neither does
oppression. It is in such twilight that we must all be aware of
change in the air - however slight - lest we become unwitting
victims of the darkness."
Justice William O. Douglas
Thread View
Thread Author Date
4 suggestions for simple improvements to MailFilter Sundial Services <miker@su...> 2003-09-29 08:30
Re: 4 suggestions for simple improvements to MailFilter Ron Johnson <ron@co...> 2003-09-29 09:58
Re: 4 suggestions for simple improvements to MailFilter Douglas A. Augusto <daaugusto@ya...> 2003-09-29 17:20
Re: 4 suggestions for simple improvements to MailFilter Til Schubbe <t@gm...> 2003-09-29 21:41
Reply to: