[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Para quem diz que nao acha software para empacotar...

----- Forwarded message from Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> -----

Delivered-To: macan@debian.org
Resent-Date: 30 Jun 1999 00:33:33 -0000
Resent-Cc: recipient.list.not.shown:;
X-Envelope-Sender: J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Subject: iMatix Open Source software
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org ( Debian developers list)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:32:09 +0100 (BST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL48 (25)]
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Resent-Message-Id: <"CYNQW.A.WGB.cXWe3"@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/39185
X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org

A friend just pointed me in the direction of iMatix (see
http://www.imatix.com).  They have written some apparently very decent
Open Source software (although I haven't tested it personally).  I've
checked the license on one of them: it appears similar in nature to
the BSD license, very permissive.  (But I'm no license expert; don't
rely on my comments.)

Their website boasts six pieces of software:
  Xitami: a web server based on NCSA
  GSLgen: template-based code generation using XML data for all
            purposes and all languages
  Libero: write a readable top-level state diagram and output C, C++,
            Perl, etc.
  Htmlpp: an HTML preprocessor
  SMT:    Component-based multithreading for telecoms + internet devel
            in C
  SFL:    Standard function library for C/C++ developers

Does anyone have time to look into these and perhaps package them?



  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

----- End forwarded message -----

Reply to: