[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

AES-Loop und gepatchte utils



Hallo liebe liste,

ich wollte mich heute mal dran machen und AES-Loop mal ausprobieren.
Ich wurde dann aber auch schnell wieder gebremst. Also das Patchen von
utils-kernel war kein Problem.

-> patch -p1 <../loop-AES-v3.1f/util-linux-2.12r.diff

Aber aus ich dann ./configure machen wollte bekam ich diese Meldungen.

-> ./configure

configuring util-linux-2.12r

You don't have <scsi/scsi.h>
You don't have <linux/blkpg.h>
You don't have <linux/kd.h>
You don't have <locale.h>
You don't have <langinfo.h>
You don't have <sys/user.h>
You don't have <asm/page.h>
You don't have <uuid/uuid.h>
You don't have <rpcsvc/nfs_prot.h>
You don't have <asm/types.h>
You don't have <linux/raw.h>
You don't have <stdint.h>
You don't have <sys/io.h>
You don't have inet_aton()
You don't have fsync()
You don't have getdomainname()
You don't have nanosleep()
You don't have personality()
You don't have updwtmp()
You don't have fseeko()
You don't have lchown()
You don't have rpmatch()
You don't have <term.h>
You don't have ncurses - I will not make ul and setterm.
You don't have termcap - I will not make more.
You need -lcrypt
Strange... Static compilation fails here.
You don't have native language support
You don't have __progname
You don't have <pty.h> and openpty()
You don't have wide character support
You don't have SYS_pivot_root
You don't have a tm_gmtoff field in struct tm
Your rpcgen output does not compile - using pregenerated code
You don't have zlib
You don't have blkid

Bei Google habe ich nichts richtiges zu dem Problem gefunden.
Hoffe ihr ko:nnt mir helfen, ich danke euch schon im voraus fu:r eure schnellen und informativen
antworten.

-- 
MFG Richard Steinbrueck AKA Zero_Cool

"Software is like sex. It's better when it's free."
Linus Torvald

Nutzt jabber und nicht icq :-)
Jabber-ID: Zero_Cool@jabber.org

Laptop: Gentoo 2.6.20.2
Server: Debian Sarge 2.6.20.2

Attachment: pgpWMrNM1C39z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: