Re: Warum Kernel 2.6.x?

To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Warum Kernel 2.6.x?
From: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 16:36:04 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] _WuPQC.A.E-B.3JcdEB@mobilix.private>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1FfmNU-00065j-1k@ds9.argh.org>
References: <[🔎] dq3nj3-bvi.ln1@ID-22849.user.dfncis.de> <[🔎] 4468FE7E.3000502@linuxrocks.dyndns.org> <[🔎] E1FfmNU-00065j-1k@ds9.argh.org>

Am 2006-05-16 01:21:28, schrieb Sven Hartge:

> In 2.4.x dürfte gar nichts mehr landen.

AFAIK soll noch ein 2.4.33 kommen...

Greetings
    Michelle Konzack


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSM LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

Reply to:

References:
- Warum Kernel 2.6.x?
  - From: Ralf Ebeling <usenet5@hagrid.posteule.com>
- Re: Warum Kernel 2.6.x?
  - From: Matthias Haegele <mhaegele@linuxrocks.dyndns.org>
- Re: Warum Kernel 2.6.x?
  - From: Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Kaputte E-Mails (von Jan Kohnert) durch X-Face:
Next by Date: Re: Unterschied testing (Etch) zu stable (3.1 r2/Sarge)
Previous by thread: Re: Warum Kernel 2.6.x?
Next by thread: Re: Warum Kernel 2.6.x?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread