Re: http://localhost vs http://127.0.0.1

To: "debian-user-french@lists.debian.org" <debian-user-french@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: http://localhost vs http://127.0.0.1
From: Debian User <lfrancois-os@tiscali.fr>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:00:23 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1124028023.6705.18.camel@localhost>
Reply-to: lfrancois-os-antispam@tiscali.fr
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 42FE904F.9050904@plouf.fr.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] 20050813213346.2C33BB74A6@nuxly.com> <[🔎] 42FE904F.9050904@plouf.fr.eu.org>

> Il faut utiliser un programme qui utilise le resolver 
> comme 'ping' par exemple.
> 
> ping localhost
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms

Reply to:

References:
- RE: http://localhost vs http://127.0.0.1
  - From: François DESMOTTES <fdesmottes@free.fr>
- Re: http://localhost vs http://127.0.0.1
  - From: "Pascal@plouf" <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>

Prev by Date: RE: http://localhost vs http://127.0.0.1
Next by Date: Lancer eth0 au démarrage
Previous by thread: Re: http://localhost vs http://127.0.0.1
Next by thread: RE: http://localhost vs http://127.0.0.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread