[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

unmet dependencies



Bonjour,

je suis sous woody,
pour installer qques packages "testing"
j'ai du ajouter cette ligne dans sources.list :
deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian testing main

Une fois que j'ai installé ce qui m'intéressait,
j'ai retiré cette ligne (je n'ai qu'un modem)

Et maintenant j'essaye d'installer php4 et...
problème :






# apt-get -s install php4
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean
that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using
the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet
been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is
extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report
against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the
situation:

Sorry, but the following packages have unmet
dependencies:
php4: Depends: libbz2-1.0 but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: libdb2 (>= 2:2.7.7-4) but it is not going to
be installed
Depends: libexpat1 (>= 1.95.2-6) but it is not going
to be installed
Depends: libmm11 but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libpam0g (>= 0.72-1) but it is not going to
be installed
Depends: libpcre3 but it is not going to be installed
Depends: zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: apache-common (>= 1.3.23) but it is not going
to be installed
Depends: fileutils (>= 4.0-5) but it is not going to
be installed
E: Sorry, broken packages





??? Ca veut dire quoi concrètement ?
Et y a t-il un moyen de remédier à ca ?
D'installer php4 ?

j'ai essayé :
apt-get -f install  
mais ca n'a rien donné...



merci d'avance !





___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com



Reply to: