[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debian] Fritz Card PCI v2.0 Debian fähig ?



Hi Michael!

> aha.... Hatte mir nicht mal hier einer erzählt, diese CAPI Zeug ist zu
> isdn4linux kompatibel?
> 
> fragen:
>  - kann man DEBUG level höher setzen?
>  - gibt es den Source von diesen capiplugin?
>  - was sagt (groups|www).google.org dazu?

-capiplugin is aus sid
-bei google hab ich nur etwas f@r die installation der karte 
 gefunden und die l]uft ja schon. Zumindest treiber maessig.
- ich habe debug 5
 ist aber auch nicht viel mehr...
------------
/var/log/debug

Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[834]: capiplugin: contr=1
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[834]: controller 1: listen_change_state 0 -> 1
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[834]: contr 1: listenconf Info=0x0000 (No additional information) infomask=0x144 cipmask=0x0 capimask2=0x0
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[834]: controller 1: listen_change_state 1 -> 0
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x0 0 -> 1 event=1
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 1 -> 2 event=3
Sep 20 15:48:50 ralix pppd[834]: DISCONNECT_IND reason 0x3483 (No route to destination) for plci 0x101
Sep 20 15:48:50 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 2 -> 8 event=9
Sep 20 15:48:50 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 8 -> 0 event=11
Sep 20 15:48:55 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x0 0 -> 1 event=1
Sep 20 15:48:55 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 1 -> 2 event=3
Sep 20 15:48:56 ralix pppd[834]: DISCONNECT_IND reason 0x3483 (No route to destination) for plci 0x101
Sep 20 15:48:56 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 2 -> 8 event=9
Sep 20 15:48:56 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 8 -> 0 event=11
Sep 20 15:49:01 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x0 0 -> 1 event=1
Sep 20 15:49:01 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 1 -> 2 event=3
Sep 20 15:49:03 ralix pppd[834]: DISCONNECT_IND reason 0x3483 (No route to destination) for plci 0x101
Sep 20 15:49:03 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 2 -> 8 event=9
Sep 20 15:49:03 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 8 -> 0 event=11
Sep 20 15:49:08 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x0 0 -> 1 event=1
Sep 20 15:49:08 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 1 -> 2 event=3
Sep 20 15:49:09 ralix pppd[834]: DISCONNECT_IND reason 0x3483 (No route to destination) for plci 0x101
Sep 20 15:49:09 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 2 -> 8 event=9
Sep 20 15:49:09 ralix pppd[834]: plci_change_state:0x101 8 -> 0 event=11
-------
/var/log/messages

Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[833]: Plugin /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.1/userpass.so loaded.
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[833]: Plugin /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.1/capiplugin.so loaded.
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[833]: capiplugin: $Revision: 1.17 $
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[833]: capiconn:  1.5 
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix kernel: kcapi: appl 2 up
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[834]: pppd 2.4.1 started by root, uid 0
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[834]: capiplugin: phase serialconn
Sep 20 15:48:47 ralix pppd[834]: capiplugin: dialing 3316200102 (hdlc)
Sep 20 15:48:50 ralix pppd[834]: capiplugin: disconnect(remote): "" -> "3316200102" outgoing (pcli=0x101/ncci=0x0) 0x3483 (0x0000) - No route to destination
Sep 20 15:48:55 ralix pppd[834]: capiplugin: dialing 3316200102 (hdlc)
Sep 20 15:48:56 ralix pppd[834]: capiplugin: disconnect(remote): "" -> "3316200102" outgoing (pcli=0x101/ncci=0x0) 0x3483 (0x0000) - No route to destination
Sep 20 15:49:01 ralix pppd[834]: capiplugin: dialing 3316200102 (hdlc)
Sep 20 15:49:03 ralix pppd[834]: capiplugin: disconnect(remote): "" -> "3316200102" outgoing (pcli=0x101/ncci=0x0) 0x3483 (0x0000) - No route to destination
Sep 20 15:49:08 ralix pppd[834]: capiplugin: dialing 3316200102 (hdlc)
Sep 20 15:49:09 ralix pppd[834]: capiplugin: disconnect(remote): "" -> "3316200102" outgoing (pcli=0x101/ncci=0x0) 0x3483 (0x0000) - No route to destination
Sep 20 15:49:10 ralix pppd[834]: Exit.
Sep 20 15:49:10 ralix kernel: kcapi: appl 2 down

-- 
Ralph
----------
   Hardcore 4 life...
	----------------

Attachment: pgp6q3ZmS6VvI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: