debian-toolchain May 2016 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Marcin Drzewiecki zaprasza Cię do GoldenLine.pl (przypomnienie) Bug#766613: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-mipsel is functional incomplete) Bug#766614: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-arm64 is functional incomplete) Bug#766615: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-ppc64el is functional incomplete) Bug#766616: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-armel is functional incomplete) Bug#766617: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-arm64 is functional incomplete) Bug#766618: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-powerpc is functional incomplete) Bug#766619: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-armhf is functional incomplete) Bug#766621: marked as done (the package fails to build from source on buildds and has unmet dependencies) Bug#766622: marked as done (the package fails to build from source on buildds and has unmet dependencies) Bug#766623: marked as done (the package fails to build from source on buildds and has unmet dependencies) Bug#766624: marked as done (the package fails to build from source on buildds and has unmet dependencies) Bug#766625: marked as done (the package fails to build from source on buildds and has unmet dependencies) Bug#766626: marked as done (the package fails to build from source on buildds and has unmet dependencies) Bug#767994: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-armhf: Will not build arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.9.) Bug#781083: marked as done (compiles fail with arm_neon.h ) Bug#818765: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-arm64: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)) Bug#818766: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-armel: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)) Bug#818767: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-armhf: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)) Bug#818768: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-mips: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)) Bug#818769: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-mipsel: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)) Bug#818770: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-powerpc: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)) Bug#818772: marked as done (cross-gcc-4.9-ppc64el: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.9)) Bug#825590: Removed package(s) from unstable Bug#825591: Removed package(s) from unstable Bug#825592: Removed package(s) from unstable Bug#825593: Removed package(s) from unstable Bug#825594: Removed package(s) from unstable Bug#825595: Removed package(s) from unstable Bug#825596: Removed package(s) from unstable cross-gcc_87_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable cross-gcc_88_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable cross-gcc_89_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable cross-gcc_90_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, usertagging 766625 ..., usertagging 766626 ..., usertagging 818768 ... Processing of cross-gcc_87_amd64.changes Processing of cross-gcc_88_amd64.changes Processing of cross-gcc_89_amd64.changes Processing of cross-gcc_90_amd64.changes should the GCC 4.9 cross compiler be removed from unstable? The last update was on 08:14 GMT Wed Jun 05. There are 49 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc