Re: fw: gfortran transition release goal proposal
Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 07:39:41PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> I am not a maintainer of any of the affected packages, but I am
>> interested in this transition.
> It would be great if you can look at lapack and atlas as well.
Should I do this after the refblas3 package is updated in Debian or should I
go ahead and test lapack3, atlas etc.,?
>> There is a problem with compiling refblas package with gfortran (some
>> tests do not pass).
>> Would anyone like to take a look at it? Since many packages depend upon
>> refblas, I think this could be a significant hindrance to the transition.
> Notie what I said in the original transition mail:
>> On ia32 and amd64, you might need to use the -ffloat-store option for
>> gfortran to achieve identical behaviour with floating points. This was
>> at least the case for refblas3.
Somehow missed it. Thanks for pointing it out.
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi