Why isn't gcc-2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2) packaged (for kernel 2.4 builds)
Neil L. Roeth writes:
> I don't think you understand - I don't believe there is a bug in gcc.
You're right. Until you describe the problem and submit an appropriate
bug report, I don't understand it. If it's not a gcc bug, then a
statement why A+ cannot use gcc-2.95.3 would be helpful. I cannot find
such a statement on the web page.
> The source code I am trying to compile is just not up to date with the
> differences between 2.91.66 and 2.95.2. While we work on updating the
> source code to 2.95.2, there's value to me in making the older
> compiler available in potato (or woody) so I can make a Debian package
> out of it now.
- you cannot make egcs-1.1.2 available in potato; it's frozen.
- as Ray pointed out egcs-1.1.2 doesn't build with glibc-2.2.
Reply to: