Your message dated Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:05:26 +0200 with message-id <5cbb28e4-22a9-99cb-c9da-f90e5cf95d6a@web.de> and subject line Re: Bug#964725: texlive-latex-recommended: Package xparse (required for example via mdframed) gives Undefined control sequence has caused the Debian Bug report #964725, regarding texlive-latex-recommended: Package xparse (required for example via mdframed) gives Undefined control sequence to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 964725: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964725 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: texlive-latex-recommended: Package xparse (required for example via mdframed) gives Undefined control sequence
- From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 10:55:39 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 159430653925.1687.10456050280220478173.reportbug@alfajor.home>
Package: texlive-latex-recommended Version: 2020.20200629-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, An article I was working on started to throw me lots and lots of errors and not generating any PDF when passed to `pdflatex` after the last upgrade of Texlive. I reduced the problem to the followint test case: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{mdframed} \begin{document} haha \end{document} The errors I get start with: % pdflatex test.tex This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.21 (TeX Live 2020/Debian) (preloaded format=pdflatex) restricted \write18 enabled. entering extended mode (./test.tex LaTeX2e <2020-02-02> patch level 5 L3 programming layer <2020-04-06> (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/article.cls Document Class: article 2019/12/20 v1.4l Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/size10.clo)) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/mdframed/mdframed.sty (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/kvoptions/kvoptions.sty (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/ltxcmds/ltxcmds.sty) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/kvsetkeys/kvsetkeys.sty)) (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/l3packages/xparse/xparse.sty (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/l3kernel/expl3.sty ! Undefined control sequence. l.67 \bool _new:N \g__expl_reload_bool ? Same happens if I usepackage on "xparse" rather than "mdframed", tho I'm not familiar with this package so I'm not sure if it's OK to pass that to usepackage. -- Package-specific info: IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning the packaging of TeX Live as relevant. If you have problems with combination of packages in a LaTeX document, please consult your local TeX User Group, the comp.text.tex user group, the author of the original .sty file, or any other help resource. In particular, bugs that are related to up-upstream, i.e., neither Debian nor TeX Live (upstream), but the original package authors, will be closed immediately. *** The Debian TeX Team is *not* a LaTeX Help Desk *** If you report an error when running one of the TeX-related binaries (latex, pdftex, metafont,...), or if the bug is related to bad or wrong output, please include a MINIMAL example input file that produces the error in your report. Please run your example with (pdf)latex -recorder ... (or any other program that supports -recorder) and send us the generated file with the extension .fls, it lists all the files loaded during the run and can easily explain problems induced by outdated files in your home directory. Don't forget to also include minimal examples of other files that are needed, e.g. bibtex databases. Often it also helps to include the logfile. Please, never send included pictures! If your example file isn't short or produces more than one page of output (except when multiple pages are needed to show the problem), you can probably minimize it further. Instructions on how to do that can be found at http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini-en.html (english) or http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini.html (german) ################################## minimal input file ################################## other files ###################################### List of ls-R files -rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 80 Apr 3 2016 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2270 Jul 8 18:24 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Jun 8 04:31 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jun 28 21:59 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jun 28 21:59 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 80 Apr 14 2014 /usr/share/texlive/texmf/ls-R ###################################### Config files -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Jun 16 17:38 /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Jun 28 21:59 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf -> /var/lib/texmf/fmtutil.cnf-DEBIAN lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Jun 28 21:59 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg -> /var/lib/texmf/updmap.cfg-DEBIAN -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5033 Jul 8 18:23 /var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat ###################################### Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/ total 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 Aug 24 2006 mktex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Jun 16 17:38 texmf.cnf ###################################### md5sums of texmf.d ca40c66f144b4bafc3e59a2dd32ecb9c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/00debian.cnf -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 5.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages texlive-latex-recommended depends on: ii tex-common 6.15 ii texlive-base 2020.20200629-1 ii texlive-binaries 2020.20200327.54578-4+b1 ii texlive-latex-base 2020.20200629-1 texlive-latex-recommended recommends no packages. Versions of packages texlive-latex-recommended suggests: ii texlive-latex-recommended-doc 2020.20200629-1 ii texlive-luatex 2020.20200629-1 ii texlive-pstricks 2020.20200629-1 Versions of packages tex-common depends on: ii dpkg 1.19.7 ii ucf 3.0043 Versions of packages tex-common suggests: ii debhelper 13.2 Versions of packages texlive-latex-recommended is related to: ii tex-common 6.15 ii texlive-binaries 2020.20200327.54578-4+b1 -- debconf information: tex-common/check_texmf_missing: tex-common/check_texmf_wrong: tex-common/singleuser: false
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, 964725-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#964725: texlive-latex-recommended: Package xparse (required for example via mdframed) gives Undefined control sequence
- From: Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:05:26 +0200
- Message-id: <5cbb28e4-22a9-99cb-c9da-f90e5cf95d6a@web.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] jwv8sfsctz2.fsf-monnier+diro@gnu.org>
- References: <[🔎] 159430653925.1687.10456050280220478173.reportbug@alfajor.home> <[🔎] 4523e03f-6548-1e06-b6ec-9d89315976d2@web.de> <[🔎] 159430653925.1687.10456050280220478173.reportbug@alfajor.home> <[🔎] jwv8sfsctz2.fsf-monnier+diro@gnu.org>
Am 09.07.2020 um 22:33 teilte Stefan Monnier mit: Hi, >>> An article I was working on started to throw me lots and lots of errors and not >>> generating any PDF when passed to `pdflatex` after the last upgrade of Texlive. > [...] >> https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/550158/undefined-control-sequence-in-expl3 >> >> says that it could be caused by a local format file sitting below >> ~/.texmf . Could you check? > > Indeed I did > > rm -rf ~/.texlive20* > > and the problem's gone! Thanks a lot! > > This said, while I now have a solution for my own, I don't think > I should have to do that, so it'd be important to make sure this gets > fixed automatically (e.g. by using a fresh new ~/.texlive<foo> rather > than reusing one that may contain stale data, or by detecting the stale > data and removing it on-the-fly). > I don't intend to implement methods to fix your home dir. I'm pretty sure there are millions of people outside, which will be upset, if I do. I'm closing the issue right now. Hilmar -- sigfault #206401 http://counter.li.orgAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---