Re: LuaTeX 1.0.0?
>I'll also drop a note to the teckit Debian and upstream maintainers -
Good luck with that - I was in contact with him when it was first uploaded by then he disappeared and never answered any email, so I guess teckit as separate package is dead for now.
Thanks for the code in the other email, I'm away from my computer due to a long weekend here, I'll test it when I'm back.
Norbert
On January 6, 2017 11:35:21 PM GMT+09:00, Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 08:38:42PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> > I don't know what we should do for stretch - I guess ask for an
>> > exemption? Excluding XeTeX after all this time seems wrong,
>>
>> Guess so, unless there is a simpler solution. I have checked a bit
>> for an alternative converter code, without success.
>>
>> > Just a thought - I wonder whether anyone has considered contacting
>the
>> > teckit developers? It is only this one pair of files
>>
>> FOr now I have contacted Karl already, we will see what he answers,
>> since this is also a problem of TeX Live itself.
>
>Hi Norbert,
>
>Thanks for all of this!
>
>I'll also drop a note to the teckit Debian and upstream maintainers -
>there's a teckit in experimental, and if it makes it to unstable, then
>the texlive binaries could be built instead using the system teckit.
>
>Best wishes,
>
> Julian
--
PREINING Norbert + TeX Live & Debian Developer + http://www.preining.info
GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Reply to: