Control files point to tex, so the package source looks ok, I'll dig for logs when it was last uploaded, perhaps a Lintian override is necessary.
Cheers
Hmm, could be an override.
I'll check tonight.Thanks for the report!
On 22 Jul 2015 14:30, "Atsuhito Kohda" <atsuhito_k@tokushima-u.ac.jp> wrote:Hi Norbert and all,
I found something strange in latex-cjk-chinese-arphic-bkai00mp.
apt-cache show latex-cjk-chinese-arphic-bkai00mp
shows me it is of
"Section: fonts"
but all other similar packages latex-cjk-chinese-arphic-bsmi00lp,
-gbsn00lp, -gkai00mp shows me they are of
"Section: tex"
I believe they are all of "Section: tex" and it is wrong that
latex-cjk-chinese-arphic-bkai00mp shows "Section: fonts".
I checked source package latex-cjk-chinese-arphic-1.23 but
could't find any problem in it so, instead of filing a bug,
I'd like to ask this strange problem here.
Best regards, 2015-7-22(Wed)
--
**************************
Atsuhito Kohda
Dep. Math., Tokushima Univ.
atsuhito_k AT tokushima-u.ac.jp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-tex-maint-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] 20150722.153059.1615002518888943184.atsuhito@mac-deb.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20150722.153059.1615002518888943184.atsuhito@mac-deb.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp