Bug#725395: marked as done (Cannot use ts1-qtmr anymore)
Your message dated Sun, 6 Oct 2013 20:55:36 +0900
with message-id <20131006115536.GA18261@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#725395: Cannot use ts1-qtmr anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #725395,
regarding Cannot use ts1-qtmr anymore
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
725395: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725395
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: texlive-xetex
Version: 2013.20130918-1
Severity: normal
Upgrading to 2013 produces the following error in a document that works with
wheezy's 2012:
! Cannot use XeTeXglyph with ts1-qtmr; not a native platform font.
MT@get@char@unit ... z@ =hbox {MT@font XeTeXglyph
-MT@char@ }MT@count =wd z@...
I'm not sure whether this is really related to texlive-xetex package, an
upstream change, or related to another package. Other relevant packages that
get up-/downgraded when switching between 2012 and 2013 are:
texlive-base
texlive-binaries
texlive-extra-utils
texlive-font-utils
texlive-fonts-recommended
texlive-generic-recommended
texlive-lang-german
texlive-latex-extra
texlive-latex-recommended
Up-/downgrading tex-gyre (and fonts-texgyre) does not provoke or fix the issue,
so the fonts itself do not seem to cause it.
######################################
List of ls-R files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1318 Oct 5 10:09 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 80 Jul 15 23:18 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Jun 15 10:02 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Sep 18 05:49 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Sep 18 05:49 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 80 Oct 5 10:09 /usr/share/texlive/texmf/ls-R
######################################
Config files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Oct 4 10:44 /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3653 Oct 5 10:09 /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Sep 18 05:49 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg -> /var/lib/texmf/updmap.cfg-DEBIAN
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3886 Oct 5 10:09 /var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat
######################################
Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/
total 8
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 May 10 2012 mktex.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Oct 4 10:44 texmf.cnf
######################################
md5sums of texmf.d
ca40c66f144b4bafc3e59a2dd32ecb9c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/00debian.cnf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages texlive-xetex depends on:
ii dpkg 1.16.10
ii tex-common 4.04
ii texlive-base 2013.20130918-1
ii texlive-binaries 2013.20130729.30972-2
ii texlive-latex-base 2013.20130918-1
ii tipa 2:1.3-19
Versions of packages texlive-xetex recommends:
ii lmodern 2.004.4-3
texlive-xetex suggests no packages.
Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.51
ii dpkg 1.16.10
ii ucf 3.0027+nmu1
Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii debhelper 9.20130921
Versions of packages texlive-xetex is related to:
ii tex-common 4.04
ii texlive-binaries 2013.20130729.30972-2
-- debconf information:
tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On So, 06 Okt 2013, Christopher Schramm wrote:
> The problem seems to be caused by the use of the µ character if the
> microtype package is used but the textcomp package is not. Disabling the
> microtype package and enabling the textcomp package both fix the
> problem. It is actually not specific to the qtm font.
Known, and nothing that is a bug at all. THere is no guarantee
that any combination of packages work with each other.
For more information see (second hit on google when searching for latex \micro)
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/74670/microtype-siunitx-and-micro-mysterious-warnings
Closing this bug, as it is a non-bug.
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- End Message ---
Reply to: