On 03.08.11 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote: Hi, > > I'm trying to upgrade the texlive-binaries package from 2009-9 => > > 2009-10. The upgrade will remove a bunch of packages: > [...] > > The following packages will be upgraded: > > texlive-binaries (2009-9 => 2009-10) > > 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 26 to remove and 11 not upgraded. > > Need to get 7,685 kB of archives. > > After this operation, 364 MB disk space will be freed. > > Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n > > > > Anybody having an idea why this happens? The only difference between > > the new and the old package I see is: > > > > new: > > Breaks: texlive-base (<< 2009-12) > > Recommends: texlive-base > > Well, I have tested it with aptitude, not apt-get. And I cannot > currently test it with apt-get, since in my squeeze chroot there's a > problem with libc6 upgrades and apt-get refuses to do any upgrade. > Worked with apt too this morning: sid:~# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages have been kept back: cpp cpp-4.6 g++ g++-4.6 gcc gcc-4.6-base libgcc1 libgomp1 libquadmath0 libstdc++6 libstdc++6-4.6-dev The following packages will be upgraded: bsdutils libblkid1 libmount1 libpython2.6 libuuid1 mount python2.6 python2.6-minimal texlive-base texlive-binaries util-linux 11 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11 not upgraded. Need to get 28.6 MB of archives. After this operation, 16.4 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y <snip> ...maybe texlive-base wasn't in the archive yet. H. -- http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/ #206401 http://counter.li.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature