Bug#622880: Little issue in a bibtex style

[Julien PUYDT <julien.puydt@laposte.net>]

Le 16/04/2011 19:03, Hilmar Preuße a écrit :
> On 15.04.11 Julien PUYDT (julien.puydt@laposte.net) wrote:
> > There was a goof-up in the plain-fr bibtex style ; the comment says
> > how to translate "In"...  but doesn't do it!
> I got input from the maintainer:
>
> <quot>
> Both can be accepted, depending on the conventions you use (but
> admittedly the comment should correspond to what the style does).
>
> Here are examples where "In" (which actually is the latin word) is
> recommended:
>
> http://www.inrp.fr/editions/revues/revue-francaise-de-pedagogie/consignes-aux-auteurs
> http://revues.refer.org/telechargement/fiche-bibliographie.pdf
> </qoute>

Strange... I chose plain-FR precisely because I was annoyed that my 
bibliography wasn't in french, so it's a little annoying that I end up 
with latin ;-)

Furthermore the fact that the comment says something and the code does 
otherwise is odd.

Whatever you choose, I'll probably end up using a patched version to 
suit my taste -- but some coherence in the base choices would be good.

Thanks,

Snark on #gnome-hackers