reassign 603068 piuparts # taking the bug back until its clear where its from thanks Hi Frank, On Mittwoch, 10. November 2010, Frank Küster wrote: > I cannot reproduce this in a sid chroot on i386. I've been using squeeze here... > Why 2.06? 2.07 was uploaded to sid in February, 2.08 in June. that test seems to have been done some time ago, I can see that tex-common 2.08 is in squeeze at the moment. I'm not convinced this is the cause, but let me reschedule those tests... I'll come back to this bug in a few days, I've set a timer for me :) > On your system, dpkg-query says > > No packages found matching texlive-base. > > which should be on stderr which is supposed to be discarded (an if it > was on stdout, it would end up in the stat variable anyway). stderr and stdout are both collected in those logs. > Irrespective of whether tex-common has a bug, all those packages are > probably buggy, since it seems they depend on texlive-binaries. This > package does not provide any functionality to outsiders. Only with > texlive-base can they expect anything usable. hmmmm: $ apt-cache rdepends texlive-binaries texlive-binaries Reverse Depends: xmltex |xdvik-ja texlive-lang-polish texlive-lang-indic texlive-lang-greek texlive-lang-czechslovak texlive-lang-cyrillic texlive-science texlive-pstricks texlive-math-extra texlive-latex-extra texlive-formats-extra texlive-font-utils texlive-extra-utils texlive-xetex texlive-pictures texlive-omega texlive-metapost texlive-latex-recommended texlive-latex-base texlive-full texlive-common texlive-base |multex-bin |jtex-bin pybtex ptex-bin jmpost ocamlweb musixtex |multex-base liblatex-driver-perl latex209-base okular |jtex-base |jlatex209-base dvipsk-ja cxref cxref-doc context (again, in squeeze) Should we file more bugs? cheers & thanks so far, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.