Le mardi 01 décembre 2009, Norbert Preining a écrit : > can you please explain me what you try to address? > A backport? > A fun build on some stable system? Actually, trying to do a “fun build on stable system” is what made me discover the problem. But I am not trying to address anything but to provide proper, accurate information. There are these 6 characters in debian/control, “>= 0.8”, that providea wrong information. Replacing them by these seven characters, “>= 0.10”, does provide the right information. So here is the situation: - currently, the debian/control is incorrect, which: - is wrong, per se, as build-dependency information does not exist to be filled with anything, even if it works, - makes backporting harder, - makes “funny builds on stable systems” harder; - replacing 6 characters by 7 other ones: - fixes the problem, - provides true information, - introduces no regression as far as I know. > If you want that fix the deps please by yourself. I would be glad to, but I am not the maintainer of this package. That was why I provided a patch against the debian/control. In general, when I see a mistake, small or big, with or without impact, that I can correct, I submit a patch, and so did I here. Do you prefer to continue providing wrong information in it rather than to apply my one-line patch that introduces no cost? -- Tanguy Ortolo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature