another thing concerning urgencies
Hi Frank,
(all I wrote in the first part seems to be wrong, but still
interestingly I believe that I heard that from my AM, see below second
part)
one more thing: AFAIR (but I might be wrong) the urgency is NOT to speed
up the transition to testing due to serious bugs, but to ensure that a
buggy package in unstable does not enter testing before a new fixed one.
Assume that package
....-3
was uploaded with a serious bug to unstable with normal urgency. After
two days this bug is found, the package would go into testing in 8 days.
One can upload a package
....-4
with urgency medium which will go into unstable in 6 days and thus
overtaking the buggy -3 version.
This is what I remember from my AM, I got this question once. But
reading the policy I see something different:
5.6.17. `Urgency'
-----------------
This is a description of how important it is to upgrade to this
version from previous ones. It consists of a single keyword taking
one of the values `low', `medium', `high', `emergency', or
`critical'[1] (not case-sensitive) followed by an optional commentary
(separated by a space) which is usually in parentheses. For example:
Urgency: low (HIGH for users of diversions)
The value of this field is usually extracted from the
`debian/changelog' file - see Section 4.4, `Debian changelog:
`debian/changelog''.
So forget what I said, sorry for the noise, but I am still puzzled a
bit.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BELPER
A knob of someone else's chewing gum which you unexpectedly find your
hand resting on under a deck's top, under the passenger seat of your
car or on somebody's thigh under their skirt.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: